Sunday, February 24, 2013

For Your Puzzling Pleasure...

I present: Riddles!  Answers, as ever, to be found on the appropriately named page above.  Good luck!



1B. 
Four legs, no feet.
One back, one seat.
No head, all dead.
What am I?

2B.
Circle body,
Soft but thin,
Hide like rubber,
Heart like tin.
What is it?

3B.
I am bound, but not imprisoned.
I have leaves, but never grow.
I say much, but am silent.
I hold thoughts, but cannot know.
What am I?

(Also, for those of you who are regular readers of The Crusader, I do admit that some of the riddles that may appear on my blog will occasionally also feature in that publication at an earlier or later date.  While this is not true of the March paper, I thought I ought to include the disclaimer to forestall any disgruntled remarks.)


Friday, February 15, 2013

A Literary Look at: Chiasmus!


If someone walked up to you in a supermarket and suddenly said, "Chiasmus!", it seems to me you might reasonably (though not quite accurately) respond with something like, "Gesundheit!"  -- Am I wrong?  
Well.  Anyway.  Chiasmus:  I'll wager you've never heard of this little literary gadget.  It's dashed useful, though, which is why I'd like to introduce it to you.  One of my favorite rhetorical figures, chiasmus is so named because it, according to Merriam-Webster, is "an inverted relationship between the syntactic elements of parallel phrases" (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chiasmus).  More simply put, it's language in the shape of an "x."  Think a-b-b-a, if that helps -- I love chocolate, and chocolate loves me (for example).  Not to get too bogged down in grammatical details (which has a nasty habit of making people stop reading an otherwise decent blog...), I here present a smattering of thoughts regarding chiasmus and what it can do, which, I hope, will spark a bit of interest in you for this splendid tool of language.  Without further ado:

Warping With Words

By Caitlin Clancy
Copyright 2011
To turn backwards and forwards, to right and reverse, and thereby to challenge the mind, engaging the intellect in a search for truth – this is power of chiasmus.   A daring device, chiasmus bends the brain and compels contemplation. In the Encomium of Helen, for example, Gorgias uses chiasmus to posit that “it is an equal mistake to blame the praisable and praise the blamable” (75).  This sentence requires one to ponder, however briefly, in order to apprehend its full meaning.  By “praisable,” does Gorgias mean “able to be praised” or “worthy of praise” (75)?  And what of “blamable” (Gorgias 75)?  The power of chiasmus rests in its ability to cause men to think and seek some degree of truth.  The best kind of chiasmus will point to Truth itself.
Like any tool, though, chiasmus can be corrupted.  When used with the fallacy of equivocation, chiasmus conceals rather than reveals.  Instead of illuminating, such chiasmus confuses.  Related to this is Gorgias’ declaration that: “[i]t is the duty of one and the same man both to speak the needful rightly and to refute (the unrightfully spoken” (75).  Equivocation in any circumstance fails to “speak the needful rightly” and thus goes beyond dishonesty, neglecting the “duty…to refute (the unrightfully spoken” (Gorgias 75).  But equivocation has another fault: theft.  By confusing the meaning of terms, equivocation can make it appear that one has won an argument when, in reality, one has simply avoided the matter at hand.  Hence, deliberate equivocation sins both against others, by withholding knowledge to which they have a right (“You shall not steal”), and against truth (“You shall not bear false witness”) (Exodus 20:15-16).  To avoid this double trap and use chiasmus – and all rhetoric – well, we must beware of warping truth with words used equivocally.  We must scrutinize closely whether we are wording clever twists or merely twisting clever words.  

Works Cited
Gorgias. “Encomium of Helen.” The Belmont Abbey College Reader. Ed. Angela
Mitchell Miss. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 2012. 75. Print.
The Holy Bible: Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition. London, Eng.: Oxford UP,                        1966. Print. 

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Poem: The Raid of the Weigh


+JMJ

Complete with Unsolicited Authorial NOTES (Needless & Otherwise Tedious Explanatory Stuff) below! Enjoy...

The Raid of the Weigh

By Caitlin Clancy
Copyright 2012

Like thoughts unthinkable
They broke upon the shore
Like steel unbreakable
They swelled the fearsome roar
In salt-waves and the hide
Of lifeless forest beasts
They struck upon the town
And sunk in to their feasts
Revelry waxed raucous
The world began to spin
The new wine soon
Would take its toll
And wrap the night back in
Where lay in sleep
The sober few
Who alone could tell
The exploits and
The solemn still
Of one long ending spell –
Late up came
The midnight moon and
Later yet the dawn,
Where rested in the meadow still
A tawny-golden fawn;
The shouting of the night
Gave place unto the day
Where none were left
Save one weak slave –
The mem’ry of the Weigh.

Notes:
 This poem is the story of a town, called the Weigh, which is raided by Norse or Germanic savages (hence the hides) from the seacoast (hence the waves).  They take the town and feast all night, and in the morning, only one slave is left who made it out alive (in my imagination, at least, he’s made it out to the meadow outside the town), making him the last person who remembers the town and its people.  Hence, he is the “mem’ry of the Weigh.”  Also, the “one long ending spell” could be a number of things I expect, but I was thinking primarily of the night of feasting which, though long and perhaps spell-like to those in it, is ending as dawn approaches.  The fawn is just an aid to help convey the image of the meadow (and, I confess, the meter...).

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Poem: Recollection


In light of the recent March for Life, an annual peaceful protest against abortion, I have elected to draw out this poem which seemed appropriate for the occasion. (For the record, let it be here established that I am heartily and unabashedly pro-life).  I offer some thoughts here, mostly in the form of a lament, and dedicate them to those many infants who lost their lives, as well as to the thousands of wounded men and women who are their parents.  

Recollection
By Caitlin Clancy

Remember the little ones –
They are come and gone.
A red wave took them.
We hardly knew then.
We hardly knew them.
We did not know them,
Before they had gone.

They were taken in silence.
They were taken in fear.
Why did we not know them?
They were so dear.

Remember the speechless ones
Whose lives ebbed out.
Whose forms are lost to us.
Whose forms are lost to us.
Whose place is lost to us,
Except in doubt.

Remember us weeping ones
On the soundless shore.
Rememb’ring them now.
Rememb’ring them now.
We had forgotten them,
But forget no more.

The dark is behind us;
Before us, the day –
The road may be broken,
But such was our way.

Remember the little ones,
The lost but free.
Remember the little ones.
Remember our precious ones.
Remember our little ones –
Children of the sea.

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Riddle Me This...


1A.
My ever-changing form changes not.
I devour yet am unconsumed.
I am many-tongued, yet a mute.
I am divided only to multiply.
What am I?

 2A.
I whisper without words
I whistle without a tune
I blow without a mouth
I touch without a hand.
What am I? 


Answers may be found on the "Answers" page.  Enjoy!

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

The Red Kerchief - A Story

Happy Christmas to you!  Please pardon my lack of posting - an ill habit I have fallen into of late due to this thing called "Life" which keeps intruding on my (perhaps not too successful) attempts to produce gems of twenty-first century literature.  (Ahem.  Anyway.)

The following is a bit of historical fiction - the first I've ever really written, as far as I recall - and as such it (obviously) does not pretend to be a strictly true story though it attempts to give a glimpse of a very real man.  The beauty of historical fiction is, though, that something very like this could have happened.  And who knows? Maybe it did.


+JMJ
The Red Kerchief
By Caitlin Clancy
Copyright 2012

            John Adam Davidson stood on the corner, watching the pigeons across the street.  He looked, by his mother’s declaration –  and his own agreement – just about as smart and proper as any boy could look.  With his jacket and suspenders and grey trousers, newly acquired from his brother Paul, together with a fine little watch that his uncle had gifted him for his last birthday, John Adam was the picture of perfection.  The high-minded lad nodded sharply, bobbing his driving cap approvingly as he thought over again how his aunts and mother had admired him that morning.  Yes, he had to admit it – for a precocious young gentleman of six years he was a very fine specimen indeed.  John Adam scampered back to the park a few yards behind him as the traffic on the road increased and the pigeons scattered.  He scrambled up onto a wrought-iron bench and kicked his legs thoughtfully as he contemplated the bustle of the London streets, the tea his mother would serve in half an hour (and which he would not be there for if he could help it – an afternoon running in the park was much superior to an hour of being made to sit still while listening to women’s talk), and the large sign above the grocer’s which shouted to the busy city in bold black letters, “WHAT PRICE CHURCHILL?”  And it was a very fine sign indeed, John Adam thought, if for no other reason than because he, John Adam, could read it.  But it was better than that, he supposed upon reflection.  It was not at all like those horrid little smudgy letters in his speller at home.  Instead it was big and brave and did not care what people thought.  It did not cower in the corner of the page, half-unreadable, as his school lessons did.  He returned to the roadside for a more precise examination of the advertisement in question.  Really, he thought, it was more like –
            “John Adam!”
            The boy halted for a second, glanced over his shoulder to see nurse hurrying to catch him up, and then suddenly grinned.  He spun on the heels of his old black shoes and darted down the road with a look on his face that could have rivaled the expression of the infant Hermes when the child-god stole his divine brother’s cows.  Now this, John Adam thought, running, was real fun.  This was cleverness itself.  This was, in fact, adventure.  Where the idea had come into his head from he was not sure, but neither did he care.  He ran through the crowded streets, dodging and ducking and weaving, all the while waving a kerchief – a little red one he had appropriated that morning from his sister’s drawer – above his careless head and shouting “What price Churchill?  What price Churchill?  What price Churchill!” as loud as he could for no reason at all.
            He turned a corner and dashed up the block, passing houses and shops until he came to the Horse Guards Parade.  The mischievous child made to speed by the Admiralty buildings, still shouting to the skies, “What price Churchill!  What price Church – oh!”   Reaping the fruits of his unwary escapade, the boy now found himself staring up into the face of the big bald man whom he had run into full-force as the latter came around the side of a building. 
            “Well, what price Churchill?” the man asked, his eyes twinkling and a smile tugging at his mouth.  John Adam stood and stared for a moment, dumbstruck.  Then, at last:
            “Tupp – tuppence, sir? I’ve only got so much.”  The boy uttered his remark quietly and rather shamefacedly, producing the last of his birthday money from a trouser pocket.  The man laughed warmly and asked, “Will it buy us victory?”  John Adam shrugged. 
            “Might,” the child admitted very quietly, not really sure what to make of the question.  He backed away a little, kerchief clutched tightly in his hot fingers, still looking up at the stranger.  Just then, however, he felt a firm hand on his shoulder and suddenly his ears were full of his nurse’s scolding tones.  What her words were, though, he did not know.  He was absorbed in watching the bald man, who had turned and was now walking over to the Houses of Parliament.   There was an air about him; something grand that left an impression.  And yet he seemed – sad.  That was the word.  Sad.  What price Churchill? John Adam wondered.
            Two days later, in the wee hours, the man was sitting in an office.  It had been a difficult night and, unable to make further progress in his work, he intended to leave now and go to bed.  It was late – or, more properly, early – and in the darkness of a very black morning he felt both tired and discouraged.  He took up his hat and, donning his coat, made to head for home.  Stepping out into the duskiness and chilling silence of the streets, he sighed.  He reached behind him to close the door, but, as he did so, trod on something that crackled like stiff paper.  He looked down and, to his mild surprise, found that someone had tried to jam a stuffed, squishy envelope under the door.  Curious, he picked it up and carefully opened it at the excessively wetted paper corner.  Into his hand fell two pence, and a red kerchief on which was inked in a childish scrawl, “TupHenS foRe cHurChiL! cHurcHiL fUr VikToRy!!!”  The bald man smiled.

Friday, November 16, 2012

The Elevation

Today I offer another poem, this time of recent composition.  I haven't much to say about it except that it follows, in some measure, the speaker's stream of consciousness and is meant to be more a compilation of the speaker's thoughts at the moment of the Elevation than anything too heavily theological (not that I object to such things, though!).  Thus, without further ado:

+JMJ

The Elevation

By Caitlin Clancy
Copyright 2012

Sweet smoke-clouds waft over the silence –
A stillness pervades eager air –

As lifted above the high table,
Of Presence a few are aware.

O halo of light in hard darkness!
White purity over fine gold!

How comes it, my Lord, that You dwell here?
But of this no man is yet told

Gracious gift of the Father to mankind –
Sons of Adam and Atreus all!

Crippled with cravings corrosive
And cursed with the death of the Fall

Yet strangely is given, this goodness –
Upon tongues of traitors He rests

Calling in voice of thin silence
Whom Angels taste not nor request

Thus man in his desert partaketh
In Manna he never deserved

Into his house there descendeth
The one only who perished unswerved

Then round the stone table they gather
The ones who deep mystr’y behold

Eternity blending with time -
Eclipse of new, ancient and old

Simplicity of Godly glory
Comes down like the fall of soft dew

And hear now the words from the Logos -
Bold, good, wild, utter, and True!

Does not our blood rush in triumph?
Do not our souls pound yet amain?

Here in our midst is Existence!
And Beauty Himself is not vain.

Exulting – an ecstatic vigor!
Truly each, every has read –

Receiving for once is Becoming;
These children are raised from the dead.

King’s blood burns surely within them –
Divinity’s untainted flow,

And through dimm’ed veil of the senses
Perceiving the One whom they know.

The silence gives way to proud organ
And fades in the thoughts of men’s time

But still in the silence there whispers
One constant and eternal rhyme –

And only they shall foreknow it
Who took what they, unworthy, love –

And rev’renced with filial wonder
A child, a lord, and a dove.